PDA

View Full Version : Gobekli Tepe


VoxRat
11-16-2008, 01:17 AM
Anyone here follow this story (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/gobekli-tepe.html?c=y&page=1)?

"There's more time between Gobekli Tepe and the Sumerian clay tablets [etched in 3300 B.C.] than from Sumer to today,"

SteveF
11-16-2008, 01:21 AM
Cool.

A good vaguely related book is The Goddess and the Bull, about Çatalhöyük.

http://www.michaelbalter.com/aboutbook.php

FreezBee
11-16-2008, 03:28 AM
Anyone here follow this story (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/gobekli-tepe.html?c=y&page=1)?

"There's more time between Gobekli Tepe and the Sumerian clay tablets [etched in 3300 B.C.] than from Sumer to today,"

Wow -- interesting.

And near Urfa, which isn't far from ancient Harran, where Abraham's family settled after they left Ur in Chaldea (except that according to the Qur'an, that was Urfa, not the Babylonian Ur).

Urfa is a the spring of a tributary to Euphrates and marks the north end of Beth Eden, which makes the following quote from the article quite funny:

"This area was like a paradise," says Schmidt, a member of the German Archaeological Institute. Indeed, Gobekli Tepe sits at the northern edge of the Fertile Crescent—an arc of mild climate and arable land from the Persian Gulf to present-day Lebanon, Israel, Jordan and Egypt—and would have attracted hunter-gatherers from Africa and the Levant.
(My bolding)

Now, what'll the YECs say? (Not we listen to them anyway :D)


- FreezBee

ravenscape
11-16-2008, 04:38 AM
I wonder why there's an assumption it might be the first human-built temple.

premjan
11-16-2008, 02:06 PM
I doubt it is the absolute first. Humans had already been around for 40,000 years at this point.

VoxRat
11-16-2008, 02:17 PM
I doubt it is the absolute first. Humans had already been around for 40,000 years at this point.

Yes, well. I always interpret statements like that to mean "first (earliest) that we yet know of"

Fenris_Wulf
11-16-2008, 02:19 PM
I'll have to see if I can find it, but years ago I read an article suggesting that the Garden of Eden stories were a parable of the switch from hunter-gatherer to agrarian contexts. iirc it also made use of the Beth Eden/Urfa connection.


ETA It may have been this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishmael_(novel)#Ishmael.27s_interpretation_of_Gene sis_2.4

I seem to remember getting partway through this before giving up.

SteveF
11-16-2008, 04:34 PM
I doubt it is the absolute first. Humans had already been around for 40,000 years at this point.

Depends on how you define temple. There may well be a different type of place of worship coming on the scene once we became sedentary and began to develop larger settlements.

Plus humans had been around for way longer than 40,000 years.

borealis
11-16-2008, 04:56 PM
I've been reading brief articles about this place, this one is the most informative. No real extra info, but a nice photo of one of the fox carvings.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,452365,00.html

ravenscape
11-16-2008, 09:25 PM
I doubt it is the absolute first. Humans had already been around for 40,000 years at this point.

Depends on how you define temple. There may well be a different type of place of worship coming on the scene once we became sedentary and began to develop larger settlements.

Plus humans had been around for way longer than 40,000 years.
True. Calling it "the first", though seems a bit presumptuous, as though only one group of hunter-gatherers became sedentary and made the jump.

Lugubert
11-17-2008, 12:13 AM
I wonder why there's an assumption it might be the first human-built temple.
SOP. Anything (buildings, figures, implements) that archaeologists can't explain is religious. They know no older similar unidentified structures; so this must be a temple, and the oldest one.

ravenscape
11-17-2008, 12:16 AM
I wonder why there's an assumption it might be the first human-built temple.
SOP. Anything (buildings, figures, implements) that archaeologists can't explain is religious. They know no older similar unidentified structures; so this must be a temple, and the oldest one.
I can follow the logic, but I can't buy it.

SteveF
11-17-2008, 12:18 AM
SOP. Anything (buildings, figures, implements) that archaeologists can't explain is religious.

I believe the word you are looking for is "ritual"! The great archaeological explanator.

borealis
11-17-2008, 02:00 AM
Maybe it will turn out to have been the site for annual competitions, and the various tribal teams used fox, vulture, spider, etc. symbols as identifiers.

It's the first summer Olympics complex.

It is pretty spectacular, given the number of structures and the size of the site. I'd love to visit it.

borealis
11-17-2008, 03:39 PM
More pictures, interesting text:

http://mathildasanthropologyblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-worlds-oldest-stone-temple-gobekli-tepe/

Ray Moscow
11-17-2008, 03:55 PM
Can I play sceptic and question the dating here? Is it really so much older than similar sites found elsewhere?