uncool

I'll be interested

Saw your 2 comments. Re the 1st one, I'll try to make a reply later (kinda busy now) but I think mostly I was/am just being stupid. Re the 2nd one, yeah, I nearly brought up the possibility of multiple equilibrium points, but simplified it for brevity's sake.

Yes, I meant rate not time. Too late to edit!

Hey. I don't think you're un-cool.

No, I know you didn't - but I did mean it more literally than perhaps some people assumed! But that's because of my take on cognition, which I regard as essentially Darwinian anyway.

Yeah, I heard it before and suspected that's what it was but didn't remember the exact list and didn't bother to look it up. The part I mainly remember was that it was OK to prick your finger but not to finger your prick.

cool, thanks

Yes, I am aware, I am just not rising to any baiting.

I was 3 or 4 pages from the end. Didn't realize the executioner had visited the thread already.

Thanks for making that clear!