Frenemies of TalkRational: 
Nontheist Nexus  Rants'n'Raves  Secular Cafe  Council of ExMuslims  The Skeptical Zone  rationalia  Rational Skepticism  Atheists Today  

Notices 
Mathematics constants, variables and stuff 

Thread Tools  Display Modes 
05102016, 07:16 AM  #2647837 / #1 
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,106

uncool actual school on linear algebra
So the last thread, I accidentally turned what was supposed to be a "school" on linear algebra into an exploration of linear algebra through the lens of category theory. Which was useful to me, but probably less useful to the people who were watching the thread. This thread is for those people.
So! Linear algebra. What is linear algebra? Linear algebra is the study of what you can do when you are restricted to two basic operations  adding things together, and multiplying everything by a number. Seems restrictive, right? Well, that's a lot of how math works  by restricting what you think you can do, you can make more situations similar  and so you can study things much more deeply. The thing is, we actually haven't restricted ourselves all too much. Or rather, we've restricted ourselves to a pair of very useful things we can do. Don't believe me? Every day, Alice buys two apples and one banana for breakfast. Every day, Bob buys one apple and two bananas for breakfast. Last month, Alice paid $5, while Bob paid $4. This month, Alice paid $5, while Bob paid $7. How did the prices change? Let the price of an apple be a dollars, and the price of a banana be b dollars. We then get the equations for last month: 2a + b = 5 a + 2b = 4 So let's solve. Double the second equation  multiply all the numbers in it by 2. That still gives us a valid equation. The cost of 2 apples and 4 bananas would be 8 dollars. 2a + b = 5 2a + 4b = 8 Now, if it cost 5 dollars to get 2 apples and a banana, and 8 dollars to get 2 apples and 4 bananas, it stands to reason (assuming no discounts) that the difference in cost comes from the difference in goods. So we can subtract the first equation from the second, to get: 2a + b = 5 3b = 3 Again assuming no discounts, if 3 bananas cost $3, then one banana would cost $1. 2a + b = 5 b = 1 Finally, we can remove bananas from the equation and divide by 2 to find that an apple cost $2 last month. 2a = 4 b = 1 a = 2 b = 1 Notice that the only things we did were listed above  we multiplied (or divided) by numbers, and then we added (or subtracted) two things. OK. Now let's do the calculation for this month. 2a + b = 5 a + 2b = 7 2a + b = 5 2a + 4b = 14 2a + b = 5 3b = 9 2a + b = 5 b = 3 2a = 2 b = 3 a = 1 b = 3 We have found that the new prices are $1 for an apple, and $3 for a banana. But one thing to notice  we in fact did the exact same calculations as we did before, just with different numbers on the right. This will be important later. Hopefully I have already convinced you that we already use linear equations commonly. Next up, the process of solving generally, and some notation. 
05102016, 03:06 PM  #2647954 / #2 
Superior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,727

OK. That was easy. I have a feeling *easy* will not last much longer.
Bring it on!
__________________
RICHARD P. FEYNMAN Some remarks on science, pseudoscience, and learning how to not fool yourself. Caltech’s 1974 commencement address. If you’re doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid—not only what you think is right about it: other causes that could possibly explain your results. Details that could throw doubt on your interpretation must be given, if you know them. You must do the best you can—if you know anything at all wrong, or possibly wrong—to explain it. 
05102016, 08:29 PM  #2648202 / #4 
I did. F. Poste.
GLaDOS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 60,846

cool uncool
__________________
Join me at The Skeptical Zone 
05142016, 03:34 AM  #2649933 / #5 
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So. Cal. USA
Posts: 322

This is a bit different from the solution path I was taught. I'm used to solving for one variable in terms of the other in one equation and substituting into the other equation.
So a + 2b = 4 resolves to a = 42b Then substituting this for a into the other equation: 2(42b) +b =5 yields b=1 And so forth, same results... ETA: Oh yeah, "Bite me Heinz" you socalled superior member! Heh. Last edited by MikeB; 05142016 at 03:38 AM. 
05142016, 07:49 AM  #2649935 / #6  
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,106

Quote:


05172016, 08:25 PM  #2650804 / #7  
Betty Beep Boop
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 14,480

Quote:
Traditional algebra is intraformula solving; Linear algebra is interformula solving
__________________
This is going to hurt me a lot more than it hurts you. 

05172016, 08:26 PM  #2650806 / #8 
Betty Beep Boop
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 14,480

Are you going to explain eigenvalues so they make sense? Those never made sense to me. That was a case of me memorizing the steps and plugging in the values.
__________________
This is going to hurt me a lot more than it hurts you. 
05182016, 12:49 PM  #2650988 / #9 
predisposition to antagonism
Kodos the Executioner Mod: HASH, Philo, Math, THC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: on the shore of the North Atlantic
Posts: 15,670

I don't want to derail uncool's thread when it has barely gotten started, so I'll just note that this
...is not true, and I'll bite my tongue regarding the rest of my objections.
__________________
Requiem: Everything we humans do is fully deserving of ridicule and mockery. Without a God to laugh, it falls to us enlightened fools to make up the difference. 
05182016, 04:48 PM  #2651172 / #10  
Betty Beep Boop
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 14,480

Quote:
Of course, it's also been a very long time since I did anything more than a pretty straightforward matrix solution. Hell, it's been about 7 years since last had to do anything more complicated than spell determinant. So there's a pretty good chance that I've brain dumped this bit!
__________________
This is going to hurt me a lot more than it hurts you. 

05182016, 04:54 PM  #2651183 / #11 
predisposition to antagonism
Kodos the Executioner Mod: HASH, Philo, Math, THC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: on the shore of the North Atlantic
Posts: 15,670

Generally, the scope of any given subfield of mathematics is defined by its subject matter, not by any artificial constraints on which techniques you're allowed to use.
__________________
Requiem: Everything we humans do is fully deserving of ridicule and mockery. Without a God to laugh, it falls to us enlightened fools to make up the difference. 
05182016, 05:01 PM  #2651189 / #12 
Betty Beep Boop
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 14,480

Okay then. Whatever. Don't really care that much
ETA: Apparently I care a little bit. If you were pressed to make a general statement, how would you describe the difference between "regular" algebra and Linear Algebra?
__________________
This is going to hurt me a lot more than it hurts you. 
05182016, 05:53 PM  #2651214 / #13 
predisposition to antagonism
Kodos the Executioner Mod: HASH, Philo, Math, THC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: on the shore of the North Atlantic
Posts: 15,670

"Regular algebra" isn't a term I use.
Linear Algebra is about what you can do with vector spaces.
__________________
Requiem: Everything we humans do is fully deserving of ridicule and mockery. Without a God to laugh, it falls to us enlightened fools to make up the difference. 
05182016, 06:10 PM  #2651221 / #14 
I did. F. Poste.
GLaDOS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 60,846

Why "linear"?
__________________
Join me at The Skeptical Zone 
05182016, 06:49 PM  #2651236 / #15 
Betty Beep Boop
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 14,480

Couldn't come up with a better term. When I took the class, it was just "Algebra". But that didn't seem sufficient to distinguish it from Linear algebra, so I winged it.
And that means what? How are they different?
__________________
This is going to hurt me a lot more than it hurts you. 
05182016, 06:55 PM  #2651239 / #16 
I did. F. Poste.
GLaDOS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 60,846

Well, the variables in linear algebra can be vectors and matrices. So you can solve y=bx, where y and x are matrices.
amirite?
__________________
Join me at The Skeptical Zone 
05182016, 08:28 PM  #2651304 / #18 
predisposition to antagonism
Kodos the Executioner Mod: HASH, Philo, Math, THC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: on the shore of the North Atlantic
Posts: 15,670

Good (and well timed) question.
My description was perhaps too broad, since there are things you can do with vector spaces that go outside the scope of Linear Algebra. But suppose the only functions of vectors that we consider are those having the properties f(u+v) = f(u) + f(v) for any vectors u and v; f(cv) = cf(v) for any vector v and any scalar c. (This is what we call a "linear function".) That's a rather restricted set of functions, but it turns out that there's a tremendous amount of stuff to learn about them, so they're worthy of having entire courses dedicated to them. That's Linear Algebra.
__________________
Requiem: Everything we humans do is fully deserving of ridicule and mockery. Without a God to laugh, it falls to us enlightened fools to make up the difference. 
05182016, 08:33 PM  #2651313 / #19 
predisposition to antagonism
Kodos the Executioner Mod: HASH, Philo, Math, THC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: on the shore of the North Atlantic
Posts: 15,670

That's what this whole thread will be about. uncool has plans for how to present it, and I expect xe will do a better job than I would.
__________________
Requiem: Everything we humans do is fully deserving of ridicule and mockery. Without a God to laugh, it falls to us enlightened fools to make up the difference. 
05182016, 08:46 PM  #2651334 / #20  
I did. F. Poste.
GLaDOS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 60,846

Quote:
__________________
Join me at The Skeptical Zone 

05182016, 09:59 PM  #2651405 / #21 
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,106

I'd say that linear algebra is the study of what you can do with just the two operations named before: addition and scalar multiplication. "Regular" algebra, to me, would include linear algebra  but also allow more operations.

05202016, 11:34 PM  #2652641 / #23  
Senior Member
TR Pundit
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 30,945

Quote:
and to go further on why "linear", one can think of the linearity property BD defined as an abstraction of the elementary equation for a line: y = mx + b. in fact, I suspect (though don't know) that is the origin of the term. Last edited by el jefe; 05202016 at 11:37 PM. 

05212016, 07:19 AM  #2652677 / #24 
I did. F. Poste.
GLaDOS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 60,846

Well solving linear (or linearized) equations is mostly what I use it for
__________________
Join me at The Skeptical Zone 

Tags 
uncool's cool 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

