Frenemies of TalkRational: |
Nontheist Nexus | Rants'n'Raves | Secular Cafe | Council of Ex-Muslims | The Skeptical Zone | rationalia | Rational Skepticism | Atheists Today | |
|
Staff Discussion Members can post here, but only staff can start threads or vote in polls. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-24-2014, 06:31 PM | #2322256 / #1 |
Unsullied
Master of Coin
: May 2009
: New Eden
: 39,793
|
Green Zebra
How, exactly, was it determined that Green Zebra was a bart sock?
If it was then I have no problem with extending his suspension. But I haven't seen any concrete evidence that it actually was a bart sock.
__________________
". . . organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy" - Matt Taibbi |
02-24-2014, 06:38 PM | #2322264 / #3 |
The People's Moderator
The People's Admin
: Apr 2008
: 50,099
|
it's pretty clear it was bart. whether going from 30 to 90 was fair is a different question though.
__________________
list of posters you're not allowed to respond to in my threads: 1) autonemesis 2) ****/beau/lulu/muidiri/pandora/("lupa") 3) jerome da gnome |
02-24-2014, 06:52 PM | #2322281 / #4 |
I did. F. Poste.
GLaDOS
: Mar 2008
: UK
: 60,846
|
Well we voted on going from 30 to 90. It the personal info stuff that I voted it up for, not the sock.
I agree we should ban the socks of suspended members who use it to get round a ban, in case they do whatever they were banned to stop them doing but I don't see it as a reason for extending the ban. |
X vBulletin 3.8.6 Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
More Information | |
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|