Skip to main content

TR Memescape

  • Talk Rational: now available as a 12" dub version

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Wally

1
His X must have done a hell of a job on him in the divorce settlement.
2
Dave, remember to check your car for engine oil.

Oh reeeeeally? And what should I do if I check, pray tell?

Well, if you don't have enough, you should get some.

Oh I should, should I? That right, Mrs. Expert in Cars and Oils? And WHAT kind of oil should I get? What brand? Should it be fully synthetic? How viscous? What type would be best for my car and mileage? Do tell!

Dave, don't act like a whiny 12-yo.

And why is that? Why should I not ask our Mighty Oil Expert, (who DARES to presume she can tell me -ME- to remember to check my car for oil) all those questions?? Huh? Huh? HUH?

*Later*

Dave, I think your engine is smoking.

YOU'RE NOT THE BOSS OF ME!!!111!
I think I can simplify that:

Pingu: Dave, you might not want to jump off a bridge.

Dave: What kind of bridge you manipulative bitch!
3
You seem to subscribe to a view similar to Borealis View and it seems to be something along the lines that Greg knows a lot more about plant species than I do and this is one of his keys to success.

That's part of it.  More holistically, Greg knows that learning about the species that make up his ecosystem is important.

While it is true that Greg knows more about plant species than I do, it is not true that this is one of his keys to his success with the possible exception of his knowledge of Eastern gamagrass which is a nice warm season grass for getting through the hot summer when Fescue goes somewhat dormant.

So you assert. But you provide no data to back up this assertion.

But even this is not a fundamental the cows will not die if they don't have warm season grass  and the system will work without them. They just like it and do better with it.

So you assert. But you provide no data to back up this assertion.

this is categorized the same as other details such as how tightly you Bunch the animals. Or how frequently you move them. Or how long your rest periods are. And so on. There are innumerable details underneath the three main points, but the three main points do not change and they are Universal.

So you assert. But you provide no data to back up this assertion.

Dave, you like to talk about Darwin-debased minds.  Here we have a classic illustration of what appears to be preacher-debased mind - a mind incapable of seeing that saying that "this is so" is not the same as demonstrating that "this is so".  It's the fundamental error of fundamentalism - that there is a canon of knowledge and that knowledge consists of knowing this canon.

It is the polar opposite of empirical science.  It's the reason we say you suck at science.



You seem to subscribe to a view similar to Borealis View and it seems to be something along the lines that Greg knows a lot more about plant species than I do and this is one of his keys to success.

That's part of it.  More holistically, Greg knows that learning about the species that make up his ecosystem is important.

While it is true that Greg knows more about plant species than I do, it is not true that this is one of his keys to his success with the possible exception of his knowledge of Eastern gamagrass which is a nice warm season grass for getting through the hot summer when Fescue goes somewhat dormant.

So you assert. But you provide no data to back up this assertion.

But even this is not a fundamental the cows will not die if they don't have warm season grass  and the system will work without them. They just like it and do better with it.

So you assert. But you provide no data to back up this assertion.

this is categorized the same as other details such as how tightly you Bunch the animals. Or how frequently you move them. Or how long your rest periods are. And so on. There are innumerable details underneath the three main points, but the three main points do not change and they are Universal.

So you assert. But you provide no data to back up this assertion.

Dave, you like to talk about Darwin-debased minds.  Here we have a classic illustration of what appears to be preacher-debased mind - a mind incapable of seeing that saying that "this is so" is not the same as demonstrating that "this is so".  It's the fundamental error of fundamentalism - that there is a canon of knowledge and that knowledge consists of knowing this canon.

It is the polar opposite of empirical science.  It's the reason we say you suck at science.




Dave is a Gnostic farmer. :smug:
4
Dave should be a happier person -- ignorance is bliss, right?
Then Daves level of fucking stupidity should be downright orgasmic.
5
The truth is if I listened to you people .... I would also be medicating heavily

True :smug:
6
"You'd have to be an idiot not to notice he's an idiot.

I know he's got a PhD and all,"



Wait. Someone who has a Ph.D is an idiot? Can it be?

You have a BA, and you're fucking stupid.
I understood it was a BS.

I don't think they award BAs for EE.

Thanks for the fact check.  :grin:
7
"You'd have to be an idiot not to notice he's an idiot.

I know he's got a PhD and all,"



Wait. Someone who has a Ph.D is an idiot? Can it be?

You have a BA, and you're fucking stupid.
8
Thank God you people aren't running the US government.  The scary thing is that many people like you were ... and still are.  :staregonk:

Listen you stupid mother fucker, I was in the same Air Force that you claim to have been in, several years before you.

The very first thing they sat us down and taught us (as I recall, it was before we even got our uniforms) was the difference between a "Lawful order" and an "Unlawful order".

We were told in no uncertain terms that we were under NO obligation to follow an Unlawful order.

There is no place in government where your loyalty to an individual supersedes that of following the law, and that includes telling the appropriate law enforcement organization or security agency when you become aware of illegal activities. Even if it's Donald Fucking Trump.
9
"And just like you say it does with the earth, this makes it an objective fact that it was designed for lice."

Key mistake you made here.

I do not think it is an objective fact. I agree with Dawkins that it has the appearance of design.

Only if you're looking through the wrong end of the telescope.
11
Interesting article.

The sheer amount of verifiable fact in it is astounding.

In that there basically isn't any. It's almost 100 percent raw assertion.
This is why I generally don't waste time following Hawkins links to his various RWNJ websites.
I figure if there's anything to any of it, it will become news soon enough in the real world.
Very little of it actually does. The possible exception to that recently is the "release the memo" bullshit that has been amplified by the Russian twitterbots that Dave refuses to acknowledge. Nunes' hallucinatory excrement aside, virtually nothing transitions into the mainstream and these conspiracy theories just roll around in the RWNJ echo chamber like Pizzagate did.

Until someone tries to murder a bunch of people because of it.
speaking of murder... Who killed Seth Rich? And who killed Andrew Breitbart?

And who smothered Antonin Scalia with a pillow, amirite?

Scalia died while collecting on a bribe.
12

What was the experiment with the piglet that died?
the experiment was:
How fucking stupid can you be to raise a pig without killing it.

The answer is " less fucking stupid than Dave".
13

Were you being dishonest back then, or are you being dishonest now?

That's not necessarily a binary condition.
14
I have measured. I have compared. Anything else I'm missing?

How did you measure?  Where are your measurements? What things did you compare?
Hew measured the aliveness of his goats and he started with 2 and still has 2. He compared that aliveness with deadness and determined that his seemed much more alive than dead,

And he got some quantities of milk.
which varied by less than a gallon per day per goat. That's calculus.

+ or - 3db.
15
The energy required to make Dave look stupid is small enough to require MIT level of expertise to measure.
No energy at all is required, it's spontaneous. Self-energizing.

So, you're saying his stupidity has reached critical mass.
16
: No matter how transparently pathetic or retarded any of Dave's claims may be they can always be followed by something even more pathetic and retarded.



You would think, that in a finite universe, there would be a limit to that statement.

So far no though.
17
I think it's time we scraped together $20 so Dave can get laid.

Gonna cost a lot more than that for Dave.
18
The energy required to make Dave look stupid is small enough to require MIT level of expertise to measure.
19
 The development of abstract thought opened the door to all Human social behaviors.
20
How did the self-control part evolve?
Like vox said, not a simple explanation, and one you have failed to honestly engage in in the past.
If you really wanted to learn, there are folks here far more qualified than I to explain it and, gosh, they've tried.
I would like to see your side become honest and admit that you don't have any explanation. Just as you don't have any explanation for how life got started on Earth. Just as you don't have any explanation for the origin of diversity of species.
You're wrong, though.
I have learned so much on these threads - not from you, but from all the cool, interesting science posted in rebuttal to you.
It's painfully obvious that you disregard anything that conflicts with what you want to believe, so you will never understand what they have been trying to teach you.
And it's sad, because you really do want to know this stuff. And you would enjoy knowing it!
I hear this off and on from various people here. Let me list some of the things that I think you should have learned from me... Some of the most important things...

1) how to maintain healthy, food-producing farm animals with no medications whatsoever while at the same time improving and restoring your ecosystem.

2) RM + NS is being rejected by more and more scientists within the life sciences as a creative force in nature

3) many indigenous groups around the world had near Perfect Teeth and near-perfect health back in the 1930s.

4) most viruses are not bad, contrary to popular opinion. In fact life on Earth would not be possible without them. One of their key functions is to "pollinate" bacteria with needed genes.

5) Nuking bacteria with antibiotics is a dead end Street and will not result in the long-term health of humanity.

6) vaccinations are only a good thing in very specific, unnatural contacts.

7) the fact of continent-sized sheets of sandstone which are extremely flat and extremely thin Force us to conclude that there must have been a giant cataclysm in the past.

There's more, but that's a start.

 We've learned that that is what you think, there is no support whatsoever for those assertions.
21
Wouldn't it be neat if we could go like 10 pages without seeing the word Nazi? That has gotten really stupid.
Until you recognize your role in enabling modern Nazis,  it's a permanent subtext to everything you write.
I would say that some of your posts here make you more of a Nazi than me.

That's because you're fucking stupid.
22
Balanced nutrition is basically an Illuminati plot to cover up the real power of raw milk.

It's a plot by big goat milk!
23
And post by post the Valor fan club grows.
24
YOUR RADICAL LEFTIST NAZI AGENDA

:facepalm:

You STILL haven't figured out what Naziism is. 
(And isn't).

Here's a clue, Dave:  when you find yourself on the same side with David Duke, you are probably defending Nazis.

Good catch.

Dave, google the definition of oxymoron. :grin:
25
As for Trump's comment about very fine people I never accuse or defend a Man Without first hearing what he has to say for himself about the comment. And I have not read anything about what he was referring to, so I have to withhold judgement at this time.
It was widely and thoroughly reported.
If, at this point, you claim to not have enough information to form an opinion, it is clearly a case of

:lalala:
Well, in Dave's defense, he is fucking stupid.