Skip to main content

TR Memescape

  • TR: A harassment hub that is about to be kicked off the Internet for violating laws in Michigan, Arizona, and New York

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Testy Calibrate

2
Lol. Dave only sees someone arguing for vaguely the the same thing he's cheerleading for so all he sees is "yeah! Take that!"
3
To stop a bad guy with a gun you have to wait til you know he's a bad guy by the fact that he opens fire on innocent civilians.
5
KJU will meet with Trump.  And he will denuclearize. Why? Certainly not because Trump told him to. Why then? But because Xi told him to.  Why did Xi tell him to? Because Trump was the first president in decades to be smart enough to know the Leverage that we have against China economically. Trump used that leverage and Xi did his bidding. Notice how Trump forced Xi's hand but let him save face. Very few will know the full details of how Trump pulled this off and that's a good thing.

Brilliantly played, Mr. Trump.
One aspect of you sucking at science is you believe stories.
6
And this has ...  what to do with ... whose "head rolling"  ?  :dunno:

Or is this now the official Dave Hawkins Mindlessly Rebroadcasts The Latest From The Conservative Play Pen thread?
This is "ever hopeful Dave" hoping that the Darwin debased Minds here will one day wake up and realize how stupid they have been in their assessment of Donald Trump.
My assessment of Donald Trump is capable of allowing that he may not be a total failure in everything he touches. Particularly regarding Korea.  That doesn't make him anything like a good thing. Also, all you've done is posted an infographic with a hypothesis.
I cannot think of a better hypothesis. Can you?
That doesn't make yours true. This is why you suck at science.
Of course it doesn't make mine true.
Oh, good, at least you have figured that out. But ...
But it makes it the best hypothesis that either one of us can come up with, does it not? 
Um, no. I can't figure out how you managed to leap from your first statement to this. It appears your only argument in favor of this conclusion is that you "cannot think of a better hypothesis." which has little to do with the validity of anything. You can't think of a lot of things, it doesn't follow that simply because you can't think of them they do not exist or are not valid. It may come as a shock to you, but reality is not dependent upon your imagination, knowledge, or thoughts.
And the only reason you keep saying I suck at science is because someone in whom you have placed misplaced trust says so. And the reason you trust her is because she is a very slick writer and persuader.
Actually no. Assuming you are referring to Pingu or perhaps Borealis. You might want to review this and other threads wherein many other posters have noted this. Indeed, I'm pretty sure the phrase "you suck at science" may well have come from either Vox or Testy or maybe someone else. I do not believe it originated with either of the two ladies, though it's possible it did. Regardless of its origin, I'm pretty sure all of us in the Darwin Club, as you like to refer to us, pretty much independently share that opinion. You eschew measurements and record keeping. You blindly and doggedly seek out only that which you think supports you, using a technique that is fraught with potential misunderstanding and misapplication. You make no effort whatsoever to minimize your personal biases, indeed, you go to great lengths to amplify them. You blatantly ignore any questions regarding your assumptions, methodology and conclusions. And you hold strikingly idiotic beliefs along with apparently ascribing to the notion that the strength on one's beliefs are a reflection of their validity.

In other words, about as unscientific as could be. About as obviously sucking at science as could be. Obvious to virtually anyone with a working knowledge of science and the world.

No, you are not BRILLIANT and no, you do not possess a mind that runs circles around others. You are mired in the muck of beliefs that stem from ancient myths. As well as your own ego.

At first I worried that having you explain my post would spoil some of the fun of having dave not understand my subtler criticism but then I remembered that dave is an idiot and won't understand even if it's explained.
7

And the only reason you keep saying I suck at science is because someone in whom you have placed misplaced trust says so. And the reason you trust her is because she is a very slick writer and persuader.


"Not sure why you are slobbering all over an NBC report which reports an outcome and has nothing to do with what lead to that outcome and hence nothing to do with what role Trump had to play, whether positive or negative."

Yes, I know you're not sure. In fact "not sure" doesn't do it justice. You are completely clueless about how Trump pulled that off.

But if you had been reading Sundance for the past year or so, you would have a clue.
8
And this has ...  what to do with ... whose "head rolling"  ?  :dunno:

Or is this now the official Dave Hawkins Mindlessly Rebroadcasts The Latest From The Conservative Play Pen thread?
This is "ever hopeful Dave" hoping that the Darwin debased Minds here will one day wake up and realize how stupid they have been in their assessment of Donald Trump.
My assessment of Donald Trump is capable of allowing that he may not be a total failure in everything he touches. Particularly regarding Korea.  That doesn't make him anything like a good thing. Also, all you've done is posted an infographic with a hypothesis.
I cannot think of a better hypothesis. Can you?
That doesn't make yours true. This is why you suck at science.
Of course it doesn't make mine true. But it makes it the best hypothesis that either one of us can come up with, does it not? And the only reason you keep saying I suck at science is because someone in whom you have placed misplaced trust says so. And the reason you trust her is because she is a very slick writer and persuader.
This is an example of you are an idiot.
10
And this has ...  what to do with ... whose "head rolling"  ?  :dunno:

Or is this now the official Dave Hawkins Mindlessly Rebroadcasts The Latest From The Conservative Play Pen thread?
This is "ever hopeful Dave" hoping that the Darwin debased Minds here will one day wake up and realize how stupid they have been in their assessment of Donald Trump.
My assessment of Donald Trump is capable of allowing that he may not be a total failure in everything he touches. Particularly regarding Korea.  That doesn't make him anything like a good thing. Also, all you've done is posted an infographic with a hypothesis.
I cannot think of a better hypothesis. Can you?
That doesn't make yours true. This is why you suck at science.
13
And this has ...  what to do with ... whose "head rolling"  ?  :dunno:

Or is this now the official Dave Hawkins Mindlessly Rebroadcasts The Latest From The Conservative Play Pen thread?
This is "ever hopeful Dave" hoping that the Darwin debased Minds here will one day wake up and realize how stupid they have been in their assessment of Donald Trump.
My assessment of Donald Trump is capable of allowing that he may not be a total failure in everything he touches. Particularly regarding Korea.  That doesn't make him anything like a good thing. Also, all you've done is posted an infographic with a hypothesis.
14
And this has ...  what to do with ... whose "head rolling"  ?  :dunno:

Or is this now the official Dave Hawkins Mindlessly Rebroadcasts The Latest From The Conservative Play Pen thread?
How great trump is.
16
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2018-palantir-peter-thiel/

I posted this in another thread because I couldn't find this one.

Sorry, Anyway, this is truly disturbing.
17
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2018-palantir-peter-thiel/

Jesus this is disturbing.

BTW, I thought there was a Peter Theil omnibus thread but I couldn't find it. If a mod wants to move this there, that would be good.
18
Huh?
Don't you worry your little head over it, dave.

Have you figured out yet that "Peoples_Pundit" lied to you?
That you're rebroadcasting Fake News like the useful idiot that you are?
no. It appears to me that Trump and Fox News have been pretty much right all along.
lol. of course it does.
20
Ok, so Google news makes it hard to get the relevant links,  but apparently someone shot 2 cops through a window in a restaurant in Florida. The cops would not release any info on the motive saying how the story needed to be about the "heroes" who died. That was yesterday I think.  Today, NBC runs a OP ed saying police are being demonized.

Gotta say, tigers don't have their stripes painted on them by gazelles. When you act like a demon, people will tend to think that you are a demon.
21
Yes, like those.
22
It's cops that make me understand vader's choice to accept the dark side.
23
Okay let me back up. Yes I am too lazy to read the indictment myself. I appreciate those who read it for me and give me the cliff notes. Were or were not manafort and Gates indicted for doing work for Donald Trump? That was the interesting part of that tweet to me.
Really?
Up till now you thought they were indicted "for doing work for Donald Trump"?
Why did you think that?

no kidding. Because, if they had been, your continued support of Trump while you assumed that is pretty clearly based on not evidence.
24
Getting back to Rick B ... My analysis of his post is that he is typical of many males - doesn't have a very good "radar" to be able to detect where people are actually coming from.  I've found that in general women have better radar than men.  I have struggled with this issue in the past myself and have had to work to develop a better "radar."
Dave, you have literally no idea where anyone else is coming from.  You only know if they believe what you want them to believe and even then you don't usually get that right.