Skip to main content

TR Memescape

  • I read your posts. I read every post on Tr. You would be surprised how often someone lets it slip where they live or who their loved ones are.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - VoxRat

1
pretty much right about people on the Obama team using unethical means to try to keep him from getting elected and for trying to remove him from Office once elected.
::)
Your wanting to believe that bullshit is still all the "vindication" you can offer.
2
Hawkins demonstrates once again that, for him, it's always all about cheerleading / jeerleading.
Always.
3
... It really brings into question your judgement.
Which, of course, till now has always been considered rock solid!
4
yes a lot to do with heads rolling actually because Donald Trump has essentially predicted that heads will roll and I think he will be proven correct.
::)

So you think TrumpBot cheerleading is on topic ("Heads Rolling") because
(1)  it's cheerleading Trump
(2)  Trump predicted "heads will roll"
(3)  and you believe him.

OOOOOOOOkay
5
Trump is this kind of "Darwinist":

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-genes-eugenics_us_58ffd428e4b0af6d71898737

Quote from: Drumpf
You know I'm proud to have that German blood.
There's no question about it...
Great stuff!
6
And this has ...  what to do with ... whose "head rolling"  ?  :dunno:

Or is this now the official Dave Hawkins Mindlessly Rebroadcasts The Latest From The Conservative Play Pen thread?
This is "ever hopeful Dave" hoping that the Darwin debased Minds here will one day wake up and realize how stupid they have been in their assessment of Donald Trump.
So...
Nothing to do with "heads rolling"
Everything to do with TrumpBot cheerleading.

(Pretty sure Trump is a "Darwinist", though btw)
7
And this has ...  what to do with ... whose "head rolling"  ?  :dunno:

Or is this now the official Dave Hawkins Mindlessly Rebroadcasts The Latest From The Conservative Play Pen thread?
8
pretty much right...about what?
... about all those things he can't be bothered to look into himself.
9
Huh?
Don't you worry your little head over it, dave.

Have you figured out yet that "Peoples_Pundit" lied to you?
That you're rebroadcasting Fake News like the useful idiot that you are?
10
What "details" do you think the Out of Africa theory should give?
What details do any competing theories offer* ?

* in peer-reviewed publications, of course. Not some Dunning-Kruger crackpot on the internet.
Worth repeating.
Till it sinks in.
11
Then again, Bluffy does have some high aspirations so it's possible his history of either non-starts or gave ups or utter failures is simply an artifact of being so interested in so many things.
aka lithiopenia
13
What facts has anyone not "admitted" ?   :dunno:
14
Also the helium/zircon research program.
16
What "details" do you think the Out of Africa theory should give?
What details do any competing theories offer* ?

* in peer-reviewed publications, of course. Not some Dunning-Kruger crackpot on the internet.
17
Comey's memos are out.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4442900-Ex-FBI-Director-James-Comey-s-memos.html
Because the GOP Heil Trump Gang bullied and threatened Rosenstein, Rosenstein folded, and the GOP leaked the documents literally within minutes of getting them. Which,of course, would be a criminal offense if someone in the FBI or political opposition did it.
18
ehh...
Hubbard and Jones are memorable because they were able to attract followers.
A lot of them.
The only followers Hawkins is likely to ever have are in his imagination.
The biggest effect Hawkins is likely to have on real-world events is not as a leader, but as a follower.
Just one of millions of mindless boosters of the most dangerous demagogue in modern American history.
19
Okay let me back up. Yes I am too lazy to read the indictment myself. I appreciate those who read it for me and give me the cliff notes. Were or were not manafort and Gates indicted for doing work for Donald Trump? That was the interesting part of that tweet to me.
Really?
Up till now you thought they were indicted "for doing work for Donald Trump"?
Why did you think that?
20
Seems that McCabe is going to be head number one in the wicker basket
You seem to be assuming that
(1)  the US attorney's office will decide criminal charges are warranted
(2)  that he'll be convicted
(3)  and that said conviction will come before any of the Mueller indictees see jail time*

* which, in the case of van der Zwaan, will require time travel.
21
I'm one of the people that did not know this.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Peoples_Pundit/status/986950339290165248

A lot of people still don't know or for some reason can't acknowledge Paul Manafort & Rick Gates were indicted for lobbying Clinton's State Dept. through the Podesta Group & Mercury LLC. It wasn't for work he did with Donald Trump. Read the indictment for yourself. Don't be lazy.
So?
Did you read the indictment for yourself?
Or are you being lazy?

Oh - almost forgot...

Lol
I'm lazy at least about that, which is why I said that I'm one of the people that didn't know that.
And you still don't know it.
Because it's not true.
It's Fake News.

Here's the indictment.
You'll notice - or you would if you bothered to read it - they were not indicted for  "lobbying the Clinton State Dept."
Quote
In order to hide Ukraine payments from United States authorities, from approximately 2006 through at least 2016, MANAFORT and GATES laundered the money through scores of United States and foreign corporations, partnerships, and bank accounts.
22
I'm one of the people that did not know this.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Peoples_Pundit/status/986950339290165248

A lot of people still don't know or for some reason can't acknowledge Paul Manafort & Rick Gates were indicted for lobbying Clinton's State Dept. through the Podesta Group & Mercury LLC. It wasn't for work he did with Donald Trump. Read the indictment for yourself. Don't be lazy.
So?
Did you read the indictment for yourself?
Or are you being lazy?

Oh - almost forgot...

Lol
23
Quote
I am in fact a scientist and understand evolution better than most folks here. But not worth arguing.
I wonder what "Socrates" means by "scientist"?
Anybody?
24
UN ambassador Haley put her foot in her mouth by getting out ahead of the curve, that's all.
That's a pretty huge error to make.
Huge, as in ax-worthy.

I wonder why Kudlow felt the need to back down and apologize?  :hmm:
25
Time to remind our guests that I have offered to post to a thread about the chimps etc if someone sets one up in the Science section. To give people some indication about what I would post I will say that I do not mean humans evolved from chimps alive today. In case that is what is bothering people. But that is all I will be saying here. Set up a thread in the Science section if you are actually interested.
Anyone is free to follow the link to where you discussed this in the past:
http://talkrational.org/archive/showthread.php?p=1881077
If you want to "clarify" your obvious ignorance or not, that's up to you.
No one is obligated to set up a soapbox for you in the actual Science forum.
You have no business being there.