Skip to main content

TR Memescape

  • Talk Rational: Park your obsessive internet addiction here.

Topic: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies (Read 2626 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • Zombies!
  • We're in the pipe, five by five.
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #50
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Dave, this is nothing but "I, Dave Hawkins, don't like the way some women talk to me."

What do these phrases mean?

"far beyond equality"
"act like they are the queen"
"bitchy and manipulative"

The last two are things you've accused me and Pingu of doing, but you never have the same complaints regarding men.

What do you mean by those phrases?
In Dave's defense, this is just the beginning.
As Pat Robertson sagely observed:
Quote
The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians." -- 1992 Iowa fundraising letter opposing a state equal-rights amendment

  • Last Edit: December 16, 2017, 03:48:30 PM by Zombies!
Quote from: Dave Hawkins on 11-23-2015 at 01:59 AM Also it doesn't help that you are a woman ... I've had some bad experiences with super controlling manipulative women in my life and I now react really strongly to that.

Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #51
Wow

Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #52

  • Zombies!
  • We're in the pipe, five by five.
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #53
Wow
Lol.
Yeah.  Back when women couldn't own porperty, you didn't see them running off because their man hit them, or went whoring.
They knew their place. Kinder, Küche, Kirche.
Now they have gone too far.
Quote from: Dave Hawkins on 11-23-2015 at 01:59 AM Also it doesn't help that you are a woman ... I've had some bad experiences with super controlling manipulative women in my life and I now react really strongly to that.

  • Zombies!
  • We're in the pipe, five by five.
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #54
Wow
Christians, AmIRite?
Like you said, there are starving homeless, and where are they?
Frankly Dave, you have thousands saved up, according to you, what are you doing?
Quote from: Dave Hawkins on 11-23-2015 at 01:59 AM Also it doesn't help that you are a woman ... I've had some bad experiences with super controlling manipulative women in my life and I now react really strongly to that.

  • Zombies!
  • We're in the pipe, five by five.
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #55
I guess lives are only worth saving if they are unborn. :stuckup:
Quote from: Dave Hawkins on 11-23-2015 at 01:59 AM Also it doesn't help that you are a woman ... I've had some bad experiences with super controlling manipulative women in my life and I now react really strongly to that.

  • Zombies!
  • We're in the pipe, five by five.
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #56
lol
Quote from: Dave Hawkins on 11-23-2015 at 01:59 AM Also it doesn't help that you are a woman ... I've had some bad experiences with super controlling manipulative women in my life and I now react really strongly to that.

  • RickB
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #57
"Wow"

"I promise you that I will engage you on this topic on the other thread."

You should have just posted "Woohoo!!"  in response to a post about killing children, Dave.  It would have made as much sense.


Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #58
Bitches on Darwin I suppose.

  • RickB
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #59
But then, Dave is Okay with feeding his cat piss poisoned milk to gullible rubes!!

'Cause what happens after the womb is not his concern.  And if he can make a buck or two then all is good.


  • Zombies!
  • We're in the pipe, five by five.
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #60
Bitches on Darwin I suppose.
Quote
The Holiness of God is not evidenced in women when they are brash, brassy, boisterous, brazen, head-strong, strong-willed, loud-mouthed, overly-talkative, having to have the last word, challenging, controlling, manipulative, critical, conceited, arrogant, aggressive, assertive, strident, interruptive, undisciplined, insubordinate, disruptive, dominating, domineering, or clamoring for power. Rather, women accept God's holy order and character by being humbly and unobtrusively respectful and receptive in functional subordination to God, church leadership, and husbands.
-James Fowler: Women in the Church, 1999.
Quote from: Dave Hawkins on 11-23-2015 at 01:59 AM Also it doesn't help that you are a woman ... I've had some bad experiences with super controlling manipulative women in my life and I now react really strongly to that.

Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #61
Are y'all done?

  • RickB
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #62
Are y'all done?

Not even close dipshit.

"I promise you that I will engage you on this topic on the other thread."

Get to engaging!!!

  • Zombies!
  • We're in the pipe, five by five.
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #63
Are y'all done?
Are you, you condescending prick? :awgee:
ETA: Have you spent any of your thousands on feeding starving folks, Dave? 
Or don't you care about life after a baby is born?
You have had a few hours,  I assumed you were rushing out to do your christian duty?
  • Last Edit: December 16, 2017, 05:43:57 PM by Zombies!
Quote from: Dave Hawkins on 11-23-2015 at 01:59 AM Also it doesn't help that you are a woman ... I've had some bad experiences with super controlling manipulative women in my life and I now react really strongly to that.

Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #64
Rick missed it.

  • Zombies!
  • We're in the pipe, five by five.
Dave's serving of empathy.
Reply #65
Dave's serving of empathy
He missed it
Quote from: Dave Hawkins on 11-23-2015 at 01:59 AM Also it doesn't help that you are a woman ... I've had some bad experiences with super controlling manipulative women in my life and I now react really strongly to that.

  • RickB
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #66
"I promise you that I will engage you on this topic on the other thread."

Dave claims that posting "Wow" is engaging.  And that somehow someone missed that that was the totality of his engagement.

But then, masturbating in the woods is Dave's definition of sex (kids present optional).


  • Martin.au
  • Thingyologist
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #67
Bitches on Darwin I suppose.
Quote
The Holiness of God is not evidenced in women when they are brash, brassy, boisterous, brazen, head-strong, strong-willed, loud-mouthed, overly-talkative, having to have the last word, challenging, controlling, manipulative, critical, conceited, arrogant, aggressive, assertive, strident, interruptive, undisciplined, insubordinate, disruptive, dominating, domineering, or clamoring for power people. Rather, women accept God's holy order and character by being humbly and unobtrusively respectful and receptive in functional subordination to God, church leadership, and husbands slaves.
-James Fowler: Women in the Church, 1999.


I simplified it.
"That which can be asserted with evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." (Dave Hawkins)

  • Zombies!
  • We're in the pipe, five by five.
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #68
Bitches on Darwin I suppose.
Quote
The Holiness of God is not evidenced in women when they are brash, brassy, boisterous, brazen, head-strong, strong-willed, loud-mouthed, overly-talkative, having to have the last word, challenging, controlling, manipulative, critical, conceited, arrogant, aggressive, assertive, strident, interruptive, undisciplined, insubordinate, disruptive, dominating, domineering, or clamoring for power people. Rather, women accept God's holy order and character by being humbly and unobtrusively respectful and receptive in functional subordination to God, church leadership, and husbands slaves.

"manipulative bitches"
-James Fowler: Women in the Church, 1999.


I simplified it.
fixed.
Quote from: Dave Hawkins on 11-23-2015 at 01:59 AM Also it doesn't help that you are a woman ... I've had some bad experiences with super controlling manipulative women in my life and I now react really strongly to that.

  • Zombies!
  • We're in the pipe, five by five.
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #69
Jimmy Kimmel doesn't understand why republican lawmakers care about tax cuts than health care for sick shildren:
Quote
Earlier this week, ABC's Jimmy Kimmel tried his best to bring attention to funding CHIP by making an emotional plea on his show while holding 7-month-old son, Billy. A teary-eyed Kimmel called on Congress to act, explaining that, "Parents of children with cancer, diabetes and heart problems are about to get letters saying their coverage could be cut off next month. Merry Christmas, right?" He added, "This is literally a life-and-death program for American kids."

Sorry kids, you were born, and are on your own. Might have pretended to care if you were aborted, but, well, LOL.
Quote from: Dave Hawkins on 11-23-2015 at 01:59 AM Also it doesn't help that you are a woman ... I've had some bad experiences with super controlling manipulative women in my life and I now react really strongly to that.

  • Pingu
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #70
"Pendulum."

Feminism has  accomplished some good things  especially where women were oppressed but it has also accomplished some bad things.  One such bad thing is that some women step far beyond "equality" and act like they are the queen.  that attitude often comes off very bitchy and manipulative and I react very strongly to that.

Dave, this is nothing but "I, Dave Hawkins, don't like the way some women talk to me."

What do these phrases mean?

"far beyond equality"
"act like they are the queen"
"bitchy and manipulative"

The last two are things you've accused me and Pingu of doing, but you never have the same complaints regarding men.

What do you mean by those phrases?

Dave?
I have a Darwin-debased mind.

  • Pingu
Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #71
Well one thing about your view is that it seems to provide a clear line of demarcation. And without some clear line of demarcation, it seems that we would be on a slippery slope  and we could end up in a very scary place.

So, Dave - where do you draw the "line of demarcation"?  And why?

Dave?
I have a Darwin-debased mind.

Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #72
Dave is not in a good place right now. Every time he is tempted to try to explain one of his off-the-cuff posts, he realises that his stance is somewhere between barbaric and indefensible.
It's his repressed humanity scratching feebly at the bars of its prison.



Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #73
Well one thing about your view is that it seems to provide a clear line of demarcation. And without some clear line of demarcation, it seems that we would be on a slippery slope  and we could end up in a very scary place.

So, Dave - where do you draw the "line of demarcation"?  And why?

Dave?
I would draw the line at conception because - like your line - it IS a definite line that can be drawn, but i feel it is a safer line that doesn't put an unborn child at risk of pain.

Re: Babies in the Womb ARE Babies
Reply #74
Damitall is having a stroke