Skip to main content

TR Memescape

  • Talk Rational: You probably won't be protected from free speech that you don't like.

Topic: We could use a Police Abuse sticky - Part 3 - Zombie Edition (Read 4750 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Re: We could use a Police Abuse sticky - Part 3 - Zombie Edition
Reply #400
Love is like a magic penny
 if you hold it tight you won't have any
if you give it away you'll have so many
they'll be rolling all over the floor

Re: We could use a Police Abuse sticky - Part 3 - Zombie Edition
Reply #401

Re: We could use a Police Abuse sticky - Part 3 - Zombie Edition
Reply #402

Re: We could use a Police Abuse sticky - Part 3 - Zombie Edition
Reply #403
Thread on abuse by police lab techs, possibly overturning tens of thousands of convictions.



ETA: For a sense of scale, Massachusetts handles around 350k arraignments (let alone convictions, which I wasn't able to find quickly) for all crimes per year.
  • Last Edit: October 17, 2017, 02:18:29 PM by uncool

  • Doobie Keebler
  • Ridiculous Callipygous
Re: We could use a Police Abuse sticky - Part 3 - Zombie Edition
Reply #404
"If you read my last number of tweets, only one opinion can be formed - that our President, and therefore "leader," is grossly incompetent!"  The Dotard

  • Doobie Keebler
  • Ridiculous Callipygous
Re: We could use a Police Abuse sticky - Part 3 - Zombie Edition
Reply #405
NYPD has been fighting for over a year now trying to avoid having to account how much cash and property they have seized using forfeiture using the same excuse.

Judge shocked to learn NYPD's evidence database has no backup

Quote
As part of an ongoing legal battle to get the New York City Police Department to track money police have grabbed in cash forfeitures, an attorney for the city told a Manhattan judge on October 17 that part of the reason the NYPD can't comply with such requests is that the department's evidence database has no backup. If the database servers that power NYPD's Property and Evidence Tracking System (PETS)--designed and installed by Capgemini under a $25.5 million contract between 2009 and 2012--were to fail, all data on stored evidence would simply cease to exist.

Courthouse News reported that Manhattan Supreme Court judge Arlene Bluth responded repeatedly to the city's attorney with the same phrase: "That's insane."

Last year, NYPD's Assistant Deputy Commissioner Robert Messner told the City Council's public safety committee that "attempts to perform the types of searches envisioned in the bill will lead to system crashes and significant delays during the intake and release process." The claim was key to the department's refusal to provide the data accounting for the approximately $6 million seized in cash and property every year. As of 2013, according to the nonprofit group Bronx Defenders, the NYPD was carrying a balance sheet of more than $68 million in cash seized.

City attorney Neil Giovanatti continued that line of argument. He claimed that the NYPD doesn't have the technical capability to pull an audit report from its forfeiture database--because the system wasn't designed to do that.

But an expert witness for Bronx Defenders, which is suing for access to the data, undercut claims that the system could not produce a report on the cash. Robert Pesner, former chief enterprise architect for New York City's Department of Housing Preservation and Development, told the court, "Based on the information I have reviewed about the technical specifications of PETS's hardware and software, it is my opinion that it is technologically feasible to retrieve much of the data sought from PETS by running queries directly on the underlying [IBM] DB2 database."

When it was activated in 2012, Capgemini vaunted PETS--which was built using SAP's enterprise resource planning (ERP) software platform as well as IBM DB2 databases--as a flagship public sector project. The company went as far as submitting PETS as a nominee for the 2012 Computerworld Honors awards. But the system was apparently designed without any scheme for backing up the database or any sort of data warehouse to perform analytics on the data.

When told by Giovanatti that the police department's IT department did not keep backups and only knew that the database "is in IBM," Judge Bluth responded, "Do you want the Daily News to be reporting that you have no copy of the data?... That deserves an exposé in the New York Times."
  • Last Edit: October 18, 2017, 11:33:38 PM by Doobie Keebler
"If you read my last number of tweets, only one opinion can be formed - that our President, and therefore "leader," is grossly incompetent!"  The Dotard

Re: We could use a Police Abuse sticky - Part 3 - Zombie Edition
Reply #406
City Police Officer Paid 15-Year-Old for Sex and Taped It, Prosecutors Say

NYPD detectives forced woman in custody to perform sex acts, then claimed it was consensual
Quote
The detectives from the NYPD's Brooklyn South narcotics squad claim the acts were consensual, police sources said.