Skip to main content
Log In | Register

TR Memescape


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Faid

1
Just so you know ... my idea of "heads rolling" for the purposes of this thread was "people going to jail"
BULLSHIT.

You had said Comey's head had "rolled". Did Comey go to jail?

Keep your story straight.
2
Which part makes me look LESS stupid?

Lol
Well, trying to give your interpretation of the events at Charlottesville, like you said, would be a good start. Or, at least, an earnest attempt.
3
"Disbelieve the obvious"

"The obvious"  being the mainstream media narrative

 Or millions of years

 Or goo to you via the zoo

 And so on
"Goo to you via the zoo"? I hadn't heard that in a while.

Talk about the long-term effects of indoctrination...
4
Here is Naish:
http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2009/06/10/birds-come-first-no-they-dont/
Quote
The fact that long remiges have now been documented in oviraptorosaurs, dromaeosaurids and other maniraptorans shows that feathered arms essentially the same as those present in basal birds evolved somewhere round about the base of the oviraptorosaur + paravian clade, and there is no evidence that wing-like arms were present in more basal coelurosaurs, nor in other theropods, or other dinosaurs, or other archosaurs.
It is really refreshing to see an honest statement like that.
"feathered arms essentially the same as those present in basal birds" appeared out of the blue.
With "no evidence that wing-like arms were present in more basal coelurosaurs, nor in other theropods, or other dinosaurs, or other archosaurs*".

* he is overlooking pterosaurs (which of course are also archosaurs)

Note: "the base of the oviraptorosaur + paravian clade" is called "Pennaraptora"
Oh My!

Naish is "overlooking" all the "feathered arms" with "long remiges" found in pterosaurs?

Say it ain't so!

Oh well, I suppose you will correct him. With references, links and copy and paste.
5
"Amirite?"

No.

"Uarong"
Not according to YOUR "logic". Which you wanted to school us on. You essentially SAID so, dave.

But feel free to show HOW I'm wrong. Start by telling us your interpretation of the events.

6
Yes I know what Nazi means. Yes I know what Satanist means. Yes I know there are many forms of evil.
You obviously don't. Even a comparison of satanists to Nazis is highly unfair to the satanists! How many millions did satanism kill, dave?
And before that, you compared nazis to 'atheists' and 'evolutionists'! It is clear that fascism only represents just another system of beliefs and ideas for you.
Well, its not like that for the rest of the planet. Not since 1932.
You don't know what Nazi means, dave.
Quote
And in this country we allow people to believe in those things. They have to obey our laws, but they can believe whatever the hell they want to.  Just as long as  they don't cross over into illegal activity. For example, kidnapping babies and sacrificing them on altars.  They can BELIEVE all they want to that that is a wonderful religious activity, but the moment they DO it, they're in trouble  with the law... At least the way the laws are currently written.  Thank God.
Leaving your obssession with 1970s urban myths aside, how does any of that affect the actual issue here?

No one said that nazis should be rounded up and sent to jail for being nazis (although being a declared nazi IS illegal in several other countries). But that doesn't mean that nazis are "fine people" if they simply don't engage into "illegal activity"! These despicable people have the right to be despicable, and others also have the right to say they are despicable and openly oppose them.
Except your Glorious Leader, apparently. He has to keep "equal distances", and to say  that peace-loving fascists are "fine people", because why not? Why shouldn't he also appeal to that demographic, amirite?

You are sick in the head, dave.
7
I was involved actively with the UK Antifascist action group for over 20 years and it was always mainly a loosish association of Marxists and left socialists, didn't meet any anarchists. The only agenda was to reduce the chances of Fascists winning elections through local campaigning and opposing them on demos, occasionally this did come to physical confrontations (I have my own 'war wounds') but it wasn't the main aim. Maybe the modern 'Antifa' is something different though?
Antifa is different in different countries. In Greece, there are a lot of anarchists within the movement, enough to essentially define their short-term plans and targets. Then again, it's more-or-less common knowledge that anarchists in Greece have been infiltrated by all kinds of groups, from radical terrorist groups to well, cops.
8
On second thought, dont. Instead, come visit me here in Missouri and will go meet some farmers and ranchers. They have much better logic than what you can learn in a class.
If they have grandfathers that fought in WWII, perhaps they can teach you what fucking NAZIS are. Idiot.
9
I completely disagree with the Nazi philosophy.  However, I am in favor of free speech as long as it's non-violent and follows established laws.  I am even in favor of people like YOU GUYS being free to voice your wacko views!

So why are you not appalled at Trump's failure to repudiate their support for him?
If I were president, I would want everyone to support me. Even people like you.  Why would he not want someone who's a Nazi to support him? ( or an atheist, or a evolutionist, and so on )

 Your logic is really strange.
What.

The.

Fuck.

Did.

I.

Just.

Read.

Dave, do you even know WHAT NAZI MEANS?
10
Well, Assange wants knowledge to be shared by all the people: On the other hand, he also wants to have his coffee Strontium-free.
11
I dunno, WT, if Washington had lost, you at least might have a decent single payer health care system right now. :hmm:
getting trolled into a serious reply here but it's not clear that the british empire would become anything like the constellation of countries it is today had the americans lost the war for independence.
Alternate history is never clear, how could it be? If the French had retained their control of Louisbourg, if Montcalm had prevailed on the Plains of Abraham, how different would Canada look today? Plausibly better in some ways, worse in others, maybe smaller, possibly bigger.

Seriously considering new sig:

Accidentally trolled tioH into serious reply while idly trolling Worldtraveller
guapo's alternate history:

america doesn't get independence.  therefore, when Haitian independence leaves napoleon unable to defend the Louisiana territory, the americans don't make a mutually beneficial deal, and instead the British army takes the territory by force.  napoleon doesn't get a bunch of cash at a critical moment, and fizzles a few years earlier.
And doesn't attack Russia?
12
If they had held Trump and his people to the fire like that before the election, maybe things would be different today. Oh well.
13
Why should anyone care what you "wonder"? You have zero credibility. Your theories and positions change with no justification or explanation.
14
Jesus Christ.

And you people have advanced science degrees.

 Which supposedly means that you know a thing or two about determining truth.
Well, we certainly know a thing or two more than YOU do. Since you really have brought nothing substantial to this subject, other than "Fake News" and "Lol".

But by all means, prove us wrong. Start here:
I completely disagree with the Nazi philosophy.  However, I am in favor of free speech as long as it's non-violent and follows established laws.  I am even in favor of people like YOU GUYS being free to voice your wacko views!
Wow. Not just white nationalists, not just Nazis, but even US GUYS! We're flattered, dave. ::)

Either way, you're wrong. Fascism is not just another "wacky theory" that can have its say. It's the glorification of hate and violence, and has brought torment and ruin to the world. One does not keep "equal distances" when fucking NAZIS are on one side. One does not tolerate intolerance. Especially if they're the fucking POTUS.

Anyway. You said you were going to give us your "interpretation" of the events. Go ahead.
15

So what was this then, a Honey Pot to get pictures of White Nationalists acting badly?  Wasn't Trump a Democrat until a couple of years ago? And a Hillary Clinton supporter? 

Dave, what point is it that you wish to make about Kessler?    How does his former support of Obama and Occupy mean he can't be a White Supremacist now, as he himself claims? 
Dave?
I find it rather odd that he was a supporter of a black guy - Obama - and now all of a sudden he's a white supremacist.  Perhaps he's a paid agent for someone in the shadows?  And the "black guy support" and the "white supremacy" are just masks that he dons at his masters' bidding?
Yes, perhaps. And perhaps He's not an amoral opportunist whose opinions and pretenses are only subject to his personal gains. PERHAPS he's actually a servant of the Eternal "Masters": The Elders of Zion International Bankers "Globalist Elites" that want to recruit pseudo-Nazis around the world. Because reasons.
And perhaps he's just a mind-controlled drone of the Hollow-Earth Reptilian Alien Illuminaughty.

How does that change anything, dave?[

Infiltrated by "paid agents' or not, that rally was still a white supremacist rally. Those people were fucking neonazis. Or were all those tiki torch-wielding fucks and Trump-clad LARPers, Obama-hired actors?

...You haven't really given this much thought besides "Fake News", have you?
16
I completely disagree with the Nazi philosophy.  However, I am in favor of free speech as long as it's non-violent and follows established laws.  I am even in favor of people like YOU GUYS being free to voice your wacko views!
Wow. Not just white nationalists, not just Nazis, but even US GUYS! We're flattered, dave. ::)

Either way, you're wrong. Fascism is not just another "wacky theory" that can have its say. It's the glorification of hate and violence, and has brought torment and ruin to the world. One does not keep "equal distances" when fucking NAZIS are on one side. One does not tolerate intolerance. Especially if they're the fucking POTUS.

Anyway. You said you were going to give us your "interpretation" of the events. Go ahead.
17
Apparently, "socrates" does not want to tell us what made him change his mind about Deinonychus.

So be it.

But he cannot expect the guests to take him seriously.
18
Allow me to help you find something to say. Try to respond to this:
And just so we don't forget:


http://talkrational.org/archive/showpost.php?p=2007520&postcount=501
Quote
Ostrom recognized that Dromaeosaurus shared many features with the newly-discovered Deinonychus. But Deinonychus was a dinosaur.

Ostrom recognized that Dromaeosaurus shared many features with Velociraptor. But we have already seen that Dromaeosaurus is not particularly like Velociraptor.


The upshot is that the dinosaur Dromaeosaurus shared many features with the other dinosaur Deinonychus.
Both are dinosaurs. Neither is a bird.
http://talkrational.org/archive/showpost.php?p=2007640&postcount=532
Quote
Dromaeosaurus just does not fit in with the dromaeosaurids. And is not like the velociraptors as was mentioned earleir.
http://talkrational.org/archive/showpost.php?p=2007810&postcount=567
Quote
Quote
Deinonychus is a Velociraptorine.
It is misclassified as such. It is actually a dinosaur.
http://talkrational.org/archive/showpost.php?p=2007983&postcount=604
Quote
Lot's of evidence of feathers in actual dromaeosaurids (birds), like Velociraptor and Microraptor.
None for Deinonychus (dinosaur).
Looks like you were pretty certain back then, "socrates". No 'ifs' or 'coulds' about it.
What made you change your mind?
19
Everyone probabl

Well I will finish off on this aspect, since there is not much interest.
You seem at a loss for words, "socrates".
20
"Trump's mental state is a worldwide threat"

Lol

This about a guy who  has somehow managed to get Kim Jong Un under control while his predecessor was unable to.
Hahaha what
21
So...
You know what? Fine. Go ahead dave. Don't hold back. Tell us what YOU think is the truth.

Should be an interesting 'data point'.
22
"What Dave thinks"

= Interpretation of Data

!= Data point

#realsciencelesson


Wrong.

Stated interpretations of data are data points in themselves, for specific hypotheses.

Such an hypothesis being, f.e. "How much of a hold does white nationalist propaganda have on whites who do not openly define themselves as white nationalists".
"Or, in simpler terms, "Is dave a crypto-racist, aware or not".

#StatingTheObvious
23
You know what? Fine. Go ahead dave. Don't hold back. Tell us what YOU think is the truth.

Should be an interesting 'data point'.
24
And just so we don't forget:


http://talkrational.org/archive/showpost.php?p=2007520&postcount=501
Quote
Ostrom recognized that Dromaeosaurus shared many features with the newly-discovered Deinonychus. But Deinonychus was a dinosaur.

Ostrom recognized that Dromaeosaurus shared many features with Velociraptor. But we have already seen that Dromaeosaurus is not particularly like Velociraptor.


The upshot is that the dinosaur Dromaeosaurus shared many features with the other dinosaur Deinonychus.
Both are dinosaurs. Neither is a bird.
http://talkrational.org/archive/showpost.php?p=2007640&postcount=532
Quote
Dromaeosaurus just does not fit in with the dromaeosaurids. And is not like the velociraptors as was mentioned earleir.
http://talkrational.org/archive/showpost.php?p=2007810&postcount=567
Quote
Quote
Deinonychus is a Velociraptorine.
It is misclassified as such. It is actually a dinosaur.
http://talkrational.org/archive/showpost.php?p=2007983&postcount=604
Quote
Lot's of evidence of feathers in actual dromaeosaurids (birds), like Velociraptor and Microraptor.
None for Deinonychus (dinosaur).
Looks like you were pretty certain back then, "socrates". No 'ifs' or 'coulds' about it.
What made you change your mind?
This is where we left off.
I wouldn't want this to get lost.
25
Oh my!

So birds are not dinosaurs- They're pterosaurs, who just happen to really-really-really look like dinosaurs! Because CONVERGENCE!

Fascinating. :rofl: