Skip to main content

TR Memescape

  • Talk Rational: Fuzzy doesn't feel ignored any more

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Fenrir

1
Quote
... but last week a Facebook friend in New York state reported 11 tons per acre DM per year. 

Wow. Impressive.

So impressive I did a quick google search on dry weight yield of hay (type and treatment unspecified).

Not so impressed now.

I am dissappint.
Why are you now not so impressed and dissappint?

2016 avg for arizona was 8.6 ton/ha for example.

Several examples of yield in excess of 20 ton/ha (with them dread "inputs" shock horror) on first couple of pages of results for example.

Lost interest after that.
2
Quote
... but last week a Facebook friend in New York state reported 11 tons per acre DM per year. 

Wow. Impressive.

So impressive I did a quick google search on dry weight yield of hay (type and treatment unspecified).

Not so impressed now.

I am dissappint.
3
Yeehah. David  trying to get to first base.

Which would be great if we were playing baseball instead of hurling.

6
Here's the hard cold numbers again...

Row crops - 5.4 million sq miles - 3.456 billion acres
Permanent crops - 0.593 million sq miles - 0.379 billion acres
Permanent Pastures - 12.9 million sq miles - 8.256 billion acres
Woodland - 15.4 million sq miles - 9.856 billion acres
TOTAL - 34.3 million sq miles - 21.9 billion acres

If you take out the forested land that leaves about 12 billion Acres which feeds about 7 billion people. So that's about 1.7 billion acres per person on average. If each person consumes an average of 800,000 food calories per year, then that's about 470,000 food calories per acre on average Worldwide.

These are just actual numbers. No Dave Spin.



Dave, does the number for "Permanent Pastures" include the higher slopes of the Himalayas? I'm not convinced that the people who are herding yaks there will think that your method is useful.
And broad swaths of Arizona, Mexico etc. desert regions and alpine seasonal rangeland.

Sheesh. Just nip into town and get some water.

Bloody knockers.
7
Orangutan are herbivores.

Bunch. Move. Rest.

Problem solvered.
8
Aaarghh

You're triggering my pedantry.

Orang utan

Orang - people

Hutan - forest
9
Dave, under your plan to save the world, what ecological systems will be dominant?
Isn't your plan to cover the world with 2 acre lots of pasture/woodlands, supporting a handful milk producing herbivores?

Well that's the crux of the matter. David isn't interested in biodiversity or "nature". David is interested in production systems and in optimising production.

Talk of biodiversity and ecosystems and "nature" is just marketing spin. Largely marketing to himself it seems.

The evidence suggesting David has no real grasp of the realities of agricultural systems just underpins his general ignorance.

And no, that doesn't mean I'm poo pooing his hobby farming or his adventures in producing some of his own food, or even his dicking about with straw in general.

The hubris, general incompetence and righteous arseholery is hilarious though.
10
Here is the Wikipedia discussion of this topic... I find this part particularly useful...

Quote
traditional diversity measuresspecies density, take into account the number of species in an areaspecies richness, take into account the number of species per individuals (usually [species]/[individuals x area])diversity indices, take into account the number of species (the richness) and their relative contribution (the evenness); e.g.:Simpson indexShannon-Wiener index

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_of_biodiversity



Which index did you use to measure Shannon diversity on your property and why did you choose that particular index?

How did you control for edge effects?

:awgee:
11
So that's a concrete prediction? Within, say, 3 years, they will be in prison?

5?

20?
Yeah ... 3 years is probably about right.

OK, so from my perspective, this prediction is completely batshit insane.

The NSA spying on Americans was illegal, but Bush (under whose administration it started) never underwent any indictment, and was never prosecuted.
Worth mentioning again. The fact that these people think Obama and Hillary (for some reason) are going to jail because the FBI might not have given as much information as it should have about its sources when applying for a FISA warrant is just so far removed from reality I can't even imagine how one gets there.
Well of course there's much more to it than that. Our hypothesis is that Obama himself along with Hillary conspired to throw a presidential election.


Our?

Our hypothesis?

Laughable.
12
Ah, the old - I'll play dumb and stupid, no-one will pick the difference - ploy.

Fail.
13
Prolly hook a generator up to David's rotational system and power reality island from the spin.

Unfortunately that renders a trebuchet counterproductive. Hmm, I'm conflicted.
14
Introductions / Re: Squee ...
Not a very high bar to aim at.

Even Jackie Lambie is allowed to vote for Jackie Lambie.
15
I'd pick borealis and testy.  Maybe Faid for broken bones.

And the seeds I'd ask for would include flax and/or hemp (that'll bring testy on board).
How many man-hours per day will your program require for feeding everyone?

I don't know, Dave.
I know you don't know. But it's worth thinking about. If you are as proficient as Walter Haugen then each person will spend about 2 hours every day producing 2000 calories per day. If one person is really energetic and needs 3,000 calories per day then that person will spend three hours per day.

Meanwhile, over on my Island, each person will spend only about one hour every 3 days on a rotation system.  :wave:

A rotation of one.

What is the sound of one Dave fapping?

It's holistic donchaknow.
16
Quote
Allan Savory has done the observation part for us [citation needed] although we can do our own observations as well [citation needed]. He has observed herbivores and perennials in nature and has noted that they are bunched together in much tighter groups than  for example cattle in most conventional domestic situations [citation needed]. He has observed that this creates an enormous impact on the perennial grasses [citation needed]. His next observation has been that these tight groups tend to stay on the move [citation needed]. Why? [Good question. Why do you think that might be?]

How does any of this particularly inform farm management?
17
Re Gouda:

Where would David age it?

In his car?

In a custom hay-stack?

A tarp lean-to?
18
Dave, are you intending any of your surplus raw cow milk to be made for sale to others?

Not sure if you are aware of Missouri regulations on this...

http://s1.sos.mo.gov/cmsimages/adrules/csr/current/2csr/2c80-3.pdf


Wasn't paying much attention but David appears to think he can circumvent the regs by making the rubes provide their own containers and filling them on demand direct from cow in paddock via cheap vacuum pump.

BIG BUTTONS!!!
19
Meanwhile most people don't realize what a stupid system it is because it's the only system they know and they've been brainwashed. Often by people sporting PhDs. Thank ancel keys.

Imbecile.

Ironically so.
20
Explain what you mean ... how do you think animals were managed back in the 14th century?  In what part of the world?

Avoidance with half twist and pike.

Muffed the landing.

4.5/10
21
Please direct me to the literature recording the farming and recommended husbandry of Wildebeest. It must be quite extensive by now.
22
Throwing mud is easy David.

It's getting it to stick you have difficulty with.

You, however, are a mud magnet. You have rolled in so much mud of your own generation that no-one can fail to hit the rather large mound you cower under.
23
Introductions / Re: Squee ...
Good morning.
24
Quote
Lol.  Cars work in a certain way.  Why?  Because they are set up (designed) that way. 

Lol. No.

Cart > horse

Cars work in a certain way due to limitations imposed by reality.

Which takes us beyond the point where productive discussion with David is possible.

25
Why are you so reluctant to acknowledge my challenge, Dave?
I don't have enough specific information.
You don't have enough specific information to check on the sites you claim are more reliable than mainstream sites?

No.  I don't have enough specific information to say who committed what crime and what jail sentence they will receive. 


But you are dead sure they committed crimes and that their heads will roll?

Notice anything suspiciously asymmetric there?