Skip to main content
Log In | Register

TR Memescape


Topic: New Who (Read 329 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • Fenrir
  • Needs a Life
  • 616

  • 191

Re: New Who
Reply #25
Comment from twitter:

Quote
*Enters mind of someone who objects to woman taking role of Doctor Who* "Wow, it's so much smaller on the inside"

 :cheer:
It's what plants crave.

  • 3,570

  • 929

Re: New Who
Reply #26
Tilda S would no doubt be very good, but I'm quite interested in Jodie's take on it. She's worked with some of the makers before and it seems likely to be a harmonious partnership on set. 

  • 1,867

  • 270

Re: New Who
Reply #27
Personally I prefer older Doctors, having grown up with Sylvester McCoy and Jon Pertwee (thanks to reruns), and for similar reasons I'm a big fan of Capaldi. Saying that I loved Matt Smith, and he was the youngest of them, so I'll admit to not being terribly consistent here.
Why do I bother?

  • Bilirubin
  • Needs a Life
  • Ain't nothing ta fuck wit'
  • 1,351

  • 672

Re: New Who
Reply #28
I should probably watch some Peter Capaldi first.

  • ksen
  • Needs a Life
  • 1,559

  • 366

Re: New Who
Reply #29
Any Doctor that isn't Tom Baker is a fake doctor and should have his license pulled.

  • 118

  • 24

Re: New Who
Reply #30
Dr Who made it out of the stone age!  :clap:  :clap:

Believer in High Powers, and naturally, logarithms.
Pikkiwoki is the one true god.

  • Bilirubin
  • Needs a Life
  • Ain't nothing ta fuck wit'
  • 1,351

  • 672

Re: New Who
Reply #31
Any Doctor that isn't Tom Baker is a fake doctor and should have his license pulled.
I have a box of jelly babies in my cabinet right now!

  • nesb
  • Needs a Life
  • 543

  • 156

Re: New Who
Reply #32

  • Pingu
  • Needs a Life
  • 7,848

  • 1269

Re: New Who
Reply #33
Two Whos!

  • Pingu
  • Needs a Life
  • 7,848

  • 1269

Re: New Who
Reply #34
I have to say, Christopher Ecclestone was one of my favorites.

  • Bilirubin
  • Needs a Life
  • Ain't nothing ta fuck wit'
  • 1,351

  • 672

Re: New Who
Reply #35
I have to say, Christopher Ecclestone was one of my favorites.
Same, he was pretty good. David Tenant however owned the role, best since Tom Baker IMO.

  • 2,138

  • 948


  • Monad
  • Needs a Life
  • 508

  • 104

Re: New Who
Reply #37
Yes, and Xena, Buffy etc

  • 2,138

  • 948

Re: New Who
Reply #38
i'm just not really sure "first scifi show with a woman lead" is what people are excited about tbh

  • ffejrxx
  • Full Member
  • 208

  • 47

Re: New Who
Reply #39
Yes, and Xena, Buffy etc
those are not really scifi, try startrek voyager, orphan black, izombie

  • Monad
  • Needs a Life
  • 508

  • 104

Re: New Who
Reply #40
Yes, and Xena, Buffy etc
those are not really scifi, try startrek voyager, orphan black, izombie

The last 2 are recent ones, the question was about pioneers of strong female leads in TV (yeah in this case more superhero than scifi but I was more focussed on the role per se than the genre)

  • Faid
  • Needs a Life
  • 3,905

  • 717

Re: New Who
Reply #41
My favourite of the negative reactions has been "what next, Jackie Chan's Poirot?" To which the obvious response is "hell yes, sign me up!"
That would be awesome.
"You foul Japanese upstart!"
"Chinese upstart, Madame".
Who even made the rule that we cannot group ducks and fish together for the simple reason that they are both aquatic? If I want to group them that way and it serves my purpose then I can jolly well do it however I want to and it is still a nested hierarchy and you can't tell me that it's not.