Skip to main content
Log In | Register

TR Memescape


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - VoxRat

1
Since we have the original interview, why do we need another right-wing blogger to provide "more details"?  :dunno:

Because Farkas' statement is only one piece of the puzzle.  You really needed me to explain that to you?
Yeah.
I do.
Because who knows what "puzzle" you're even talking about?
Presumably one defined for you by your go-to right-wing websites.

And just C&P-ing a URL doesn't "explain" anything.
If you think you've discovered some relevant new information that you can actually defend, then man up and spell it out.
"Don't just shoo us off to some link".
2
Politics and Current Events / Re: Trumpocalypse
Look at that graph for GWB!
Clearly what Trump needs is a 9/11.
3
Since we have the original interview, why do we need another right-wing blogger to provide "more details"?  :dunno:
4
Both YOU ... and the despised Conservative Treehouse ... posted the exact same quote ... you got yours from Fox ... they got theirs from CNBC (I think)
You think wrong.
Quote

YOU are the shit-for-brains.
no u
Quote

You can't even keep your arguments straight.
You don't seem to have followed his argument.
5
...
 What they're saying is here we have this chick admitting that her and her colleagues leaked classified information to members of Congress and to the press. ...
So Dr. Evelyn Farkas, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia/Ukraine/Eurasia, is "this chick" not realizing what she's accidentally blabbing on cable TV.
Can anyone spot the misogyny?

6
Politics and Current Events / Re: Trumpocalypse
lost me on that one.
It's Ok If You Are a Republican.

(had to google it)
7
But nobody DID "throw out" that quote.
So who's the fucking idiot now?  :hmm:
of course you did. All of you did until I showed you what a stupid thing that was to do.
Here we have yet another example of your inability to sort fact from what you want to believe.
Quote anything I said that could be construed as "throwing out" the quote in question.

See that?

You can't.

No matter how many times you step in it, you just never learn, do you?
8
You're an idiot here because you don't know how to separate data from data analysis
What the hell are you talking about?
YOU are the guy who posted that "analysis" as if it were data.
What has anyone OTHER than you said that indicates the slightest confusion about what is data and what is "analysis"

Quote
and you also are making shit up about what conservatives conclude from this article ... I.e.  That there was no collusion between Trump and Russia.
Who's making up what shit?
If you can't quote whoever it is you're accusing, and explain what's "made up" about whatever it is, I think we'll all go ahead and presume you're once again frothing at the mouth in a fact-free fugue state.
9

Which means that - once again - you are a fucking idiot for throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

 The "baby" in this case is the quote above.
But nobody DID "throw out" that quote.
So who's the fucking idiot now?  :hmm:
10
What amazes me is how brash they are. They take someone who is saying that there is something serious here about the trump team's connection to Russia and spin it as evidence that there is no evidence for that collusion. Jesus Christ what will they say when the heads do roll?
Jesus Christ you are such a fucking idiot I can't even believe it. That's not what they are saying at all.

 What they're saying is here we have this chick admitting that her and her colleagues leaked classified information to members of Congress and to the press.
That is not what she said at all. And you would never have thought it WAS what she said, if your right-wing propaganda site had not TOLD you to think that.
Quote
Good god almighty you are one fucking idiot.
no u
11
So are you saying that the MSNBC interview of Ms. Farkas linked by conservative treehouse is fake?

Or that their transcript of what she said is not accurate?

Or what?
Basically, that if you want to know what Farkas said, listen to her own words in the MSNBC interview.
Don't go to dumb conspiracy-mongering websites with an obvious bias to tell you what she said, or to connect imaginary dots for you.
12
Politics and Current Events / Re: Trumpocalypse
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/03/28/us/politics/ap-us-trump-correspondents-dinner.html

White House staff won't attend in solidarity with #45.
How did Donald Trump own the term fake news when it originally was a charge nominally against him.?
He's a black belt in the extremely subtle and sophisticated art known as IKYABWAI.
13
Btw, what is happening with bridgegate these days?
Former ally of N.J. Gov. Chris Christie sentenced to two years in prison for Bridgegate scandal

I wondered why all the news vans were parked outside the courthouse as I walked by on my way to work.

Looks like Christie will get off scot-free.
14
OK so the lobotomies are less "partial" than I thought.
Is there some point you're trying to make?  :dunno:

ETA: I wonder when it will dawn on you that "not agreeing with dave hawkins"  =/= "being stupid &/or brain-damaged".


Spoiler (click to show/hide)

15
I wonder when it will dawn on you guys that truth is truth and evidence is evidence regardless of the source.
I wonder when it will dawn on you that you're not brilliant, and you're not running circles around everyone else with respect to judging the credibility of news, and the sources thereof.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Quote
It doesn't matter whether a particular site has the name "treehouse" in it or "Alex Jones" or "Flying Spaghetti Monster."

What matters is the content.
The content is complete garbage in this case.
16
 OMG!!!1!! Look what else I found at Hawkins's incredibly credible website source:   :eek:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
17
you guys are all tools ...

Quote
<  quotes "conservative tree house"  > 

:ironicat:
:ironicat: :ironicat:
:ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat:
:ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat:
:ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat:

Is there some point you'd like to make?  You know ... using words?
See the words you typed that I quoted?
See those  words I typed?

Put them together, with the ironicatomid, and see if you can puzzle out the point I made.
I doubt anyone else had a problem with it.

18
you guys are all tools ...

Quote
<   quotes "conservative tree house" 

  :ironicat:
:ironicat: :ironicat:
:ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat:
:ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat:
:ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat:
19
"It's not about business ... it's about ruling"

Stupidest objection I've heard yet.
LOL. Explain your point, and try to convince US, not mumble something as you run away and try to convince yourself.
Convince me why it's worth my time trying to convince you of anything.
Why did you start this thread?  :dunno:
Because I have an addiction.  I'm thinking of enrolling in the 10 steps class.  I have an addiction to watching highly educated people make utter fools of themselves.
You are addicted to shitposting and running from questions?
He really is. Also to fantasizing that he's brilliant, and running circles around lesser minds.
20
Remember all that campaign rhetoric abouthow disgraceful it was that Obama played golf AND HE CERTAINLY WASN GOING TO HAVE TIME FOR THAT. HE WAS GOING TO BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE FULL TIME WORKING HIS ASS OFF

Good thing the gullible tools have goldfish memories.
21
"It's not about business ... it's about ruling"

Stupidest objection I've heard yet.
LOL. Explain your point, and try to convince US, not mumble something as you run away and try to convince yourself.
Convince me why it's worth my time trying to convince you of anything.
Why did you start this thread?  :dunno:
22
Did you notice how Chuck Schumer - of all people - jumped on board Trump's health care train in the last couple of days?
What color is the sky on your planet? 
Quote
Trump is being strategic here courting the Democrats on health care.  And if people want to get re-elected in 2018, they are going to make a deal.

:rofl:
:rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:



:no:



23
But a president with historically low polling numbers and a tone deaf, authoritarian style can't even get his party to vote to repeal Obamacare, even though it's been the mainstay of fundraising and campaigning for the republicans.
TBH this is arguably not Trump's fault. The Repubs found it easy to say they would repeal Obamacare when they didn't have to, but were never united enough to actually do it. They've now caught the car and have to drive it. IOW, they have fucked themselves.
What is, inarguably, Trump's fault, though, is how he so facilely promised his gullible followers that ACA would be repealed and replaced "immediately" - it was going to be "so easy!", and the replacement was going to be "terrific", cost a "fraction" of ACA, and cover everybody.
24
"Alex Jones"

You guys have a bad habit of throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
You have a bad habit of being a gullible tool.
25
Oh and Dave, since you are reading my posts, what do you think of Jim Hoft and Alex Jones of Infowars memory-holing the Comet Pizza video, given your past strong opinions on this subject, how do you NOW feel about this?

Lol
Yeah.
That's pretty much what the rest of us think about it too.
That's why we dismiss sources like Alex Jones out of hand.
And yet you - despite the lols - still cite them as if they are credible.

Go figure.