Skip to main content

TR Memescape

  • TalkRational:  Memescape that

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - VoxRat

1
Personally, it makes no difference at all to me if events estimated to have occurred X years ago turn out to have occurred 1.6X years ago.
2
Quote
  <  clip C&P lacking any reference or link  > 

... I will ignore anything of yours that is not accompanied with a reference link
3
I'm glad this shit came to light because Rauner was running some really obnoxious ads here in Illinois that featured friends Greitens among other shit governors. As soon as this story first broke, those ads disappeared.
Reminds me of my local congressperson when I was in Ohio - Deborah Price.
She ran advertisements touting her great teamwork with Mark Foley.
Until  . . .
Oops.
Then she left congress.
4
Nothing in that link and quote explains the existence of AMH in Africa 196,000 years ago, or the non-basal nature of L3.

Your "theory"  "theory"  cannot even stand yet.

Keep trying.
fyp
5
Hawkins's

ZOMG!!! NOT AN OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PRODUCT!!!1!
 :hair:    :hair:   :hair:  

post isn't coherent enough to merit a response.

I will just note, though, that the "whole Russia collusion investigation" is the Mueller investigation.
It was started, IIUC, by Trump appointee, Rod Rosenstein.
Not by McCabe, Comey, Clinton or Obama.
6
Either McCabe or Comey or both are definitely going to jail.  Probably Brennan as well. All the cooperating Witnesses like struck and page may not, or they might get light sentences, we'll see. The big fish of course will be Hillary and Obama and it will be interesting to see if they are convicted of anything jail worthy as well.
More predictions.
Bookmarked.
7
Hey dave!  :wave:

Why do you think Trump said, over and over during the campaign, that he would make public his tax returns (just as soon as this alleged audit was done) - that he was actually looking forward to it!   And then, come January 2017, when asked about it, he said no one was interested other than the Fake News*  - iow  admitting that he never intended to show them?

So, two questions really: 
(1) why won't he show his tax returns? ( like every other candidate and president since Nixon )
(2) why did he lie about his willingness to show them ( "hopefully before November [2016]" ) ?

To me these questions are central to the question "is he a 'successful businessman'?"
Or the more important question: is his "success" the same kind of "success" that John Gotti enjoyed.
You have no evidence one way or the other.
You don't know anything about his assets and liabilities.
You just buy the image he wants to project.
You are not an "evidence-based person".


*(polls show otherwise)
8
The Democrats don't have a prayer to get him removed from office. They are such blooming idiots. They're going to get trounced in November. Trump is going to kick their Collective asses even worse than he kicked Hillary's.
Pingu thinks there is enough evidence to convict  Trump of some crime because she reads fake news. She is not an evidence-based person contrary to what she would have you believe. She is ideology and agenda-driven and she only considers evidence which supports that ideology. She completely ignores or explains away contrary evidence.
Interesting juxtaposition of posts.
Bookmarked, so we can revisit this in November.  :popcorn:
9
Was John Gotti considered a successful business man?   :dunno:

I don't really know.
Or care, really.
10
Oh good, we have a factual dispute. Let's settle it the appropriate way: through facts.

Here's the "bet" post.
I'm willing to bet that Trump will not be president on January 1st 2019.

I'm willing to donate $120 to Planned Parenthood if I'm wrong.  If people accept my bet, they can donate $50 to a charity of their choice if I'm right.

Can either of you support your claims?
you'll notice if you go back to that post and those following it that I took her up on that bet.
11
It's also fun watching you guys's failed predictions. The most spectacular one is going to be the one about Trump not being in office in January of 2019. That was a howler.
who predicted that?  :dunno:
Pingu
Pingu is "you guys" ?
12
It's also fun watching you guys's failed predictions. The most spectacular one is going to be the one about Trump not being in office in January of 2019. That was a howler.
who predicted that?  :dunno:
13
"L3 originated ..."

From out of the blue?
From the Quantum Plenum?

You know, geneticists - people who actually know what they're talking about - have determined which haplogroup is ancestral to which. And, no, that determination does not depend on the Out of Africa model.
14
"Socrates" is intimating something again!

16
. You are completely clueless about how Trump pulled that off.
Trump hasn't pulled anything off.
He has acceded to Kim's play to be elevated from "Little Rocket Man" to Serious World Leader To Be Accorded Respect.
OMG
"Oops! My Gullibility" ?
17
. You are completely clueless about how Trump pulled that off.
Trump hasn't pulled anything off.
He has acceded to Kim's play to be elevated from "Little Rocket Man" to Serious World Leader To Be Accorded Respect.

Quote
But if you had been reading Sundance for the past year or so, you would have a clue.
Much as we'd have a clue if we followed InfoWars.
18
Oh my sides.
Don't steal my lines. Come up with your own.
You seem to be missing the point here.
19
Notice that according to NBC, it's not just a cessation of nuclear testing on that one mountain. And apparently it's not just changing the location of nuclear testing. It's "complete denuclearization." Of course time will tell whether this actually comes to pass or not but all we can go on now it's what is being actually reported. And it's not just "the playpen" that's reporting it. It's NBC.

Quote
  SEOUL, South Korea -- North Korea has expressed its commitment to "complete denuclearization" of the Korean Peninsula and is not seeking conditions, South Korean President Moon Jae-in said on Thursday, as the United States vowed to maintain "maximum pressure" on Pyongyang.  

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/north-korea-willing-accept-complete-denuclearization-without-conditions-moon-says-n867421
notice this has nothing to do with your 8d China hypothesis.
21
And this has ...  what to do with ... whose "head rolling"  ?  :dunno:

Or is this now the official Dave Hawkins Mindlessly Rebroadcasts The Latest From The Conservative Play Pen thread?
This is "ever hopeful Dave" hoping that the Darwin debased Minds here will one day wake up and realize how stupid they have been in their assessment of Donald Trump.
My assessment of Donald Trump is capable of allowing that he may not be a total failure in everything he touches. Particularly regarding Korea.  That doesn't make him anything like a good thing. Also, all you've done is posted an infographic with a hypothesis.
I cannot think of a better hypothesis. Can you?
That doesn't make yours true. This is why you suck at science.
Of course it doesn't make mine true. But it makes it the best hypothesis that either one of us can come up with, does it not? And the only reason you keep saying I suck at science is because someone in whom you have placed misplaced trust says so. And the reason you trust her is because she is a very slick writer and persuader.
i am a 'he'.
22
pretty much right about people on the Obama team using unethical means to try to keep him from getting elected and for trying to remove him from Office once elected.
::)
Your wanting to believe that bullshit is still all the "vindication" you can offer.
23
Hawkins demonstrates once again that, for him, it's always all about cheerleading / jeerleading.
Always.
24
... It really brings into question your judgement.
Which, of course, till now has always been considered rock solid!
25
yes a lot to do with heads rolling actually because Donald Trump has essentially predicted that heads will roll and I think he will be proven correct.
::)

So you think TrumpBot cheerleading is on topic ("Heads Rolling") because
(1)  it's cheerleading Trump
(2)  Trump predicted "heads will roll"
(3)  and you believe him.

OOOOOOOOkay